Thursday, September 27, 2007

Article in September 27,2007 WSJ

New-Home Sales Tumble 8.3%
As Prices Decline More Than 7%


By JEFF BATER
September 27, 2007

WASHINGTON -- New-home sales resumed falling in August, sinking to the lowest level in seven years, and prices tumbled, signaling the housing sector will remain a drag on the U.S. economy.

Sales of single-family homes decreased by 8.3% last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 795,000, the Commerce Department said Thursday. July new-home sales rose 3.8% to an annual rate to 867,000; originally, the government said July sales rose by 2.8% to 870,000.

The median estimate of 26 economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires was a 4.6% decline in August sales to an 830,000 annual rate. The level of 795,000 was the lowest since 793,000 in June 2000.

Year-to-year, new-home sales were 21.2% lower than the level in August 2006.

The housing sector has cost the U.S. economy growth for six straight quarters. Tightening of lending standards and troubles in the mortgage market have made it more difficult for would-be buyers. And falling home prices are causing them to think twice about a purchase.

The median price of a new home decreased by 7.5% to $225,700 in August from $243,900 in August 2006. The average price declined by 8.0% to $292,000 from $317,300 a year earlier. In July this year, the median price was $246,200 and the average was $306,200.

The ratio of new houses for sale to houses sold rose during August, going to 8.2 from 7.6 in July. There were an estimated 529,000 homes for sale at the end of August, down from July's 537,000.

Regionally last month, new-home sales decreased 20.8% in the West and 14.7% in the South. Sales increased 42.3% in the Northeast and 20.5% in the Midwest.

An estimated 68,000 homes were actually sold in August, down from 74,000 in July, based on figures not seasonally adjusted.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Article in September 21, 2007 Detroit Free press

Expert: Slump end in sight

State's home sales will recover, he says

September 21, 2007

BY KATHERINE YUNG
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

The chief economist of National City Corp. predicted Thursday that Michigan's housing market would bottom out a year from now.

"We're starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel," Richard DeKaser said shortly before sharing his economic outlook with some of the bank's clients during a luncheon at Ford Field.

DeKaser said the state's steep decline in construction activity should end next year, but home prices will remain under downward pressure as the effect of massive job losses takes its toll.

He warned that employment growth in Michigan is likely to continue to lag behind the rest of the nation. But the declining value of the dollar should prove a boon for exports from the state's companies.

At the moment, however, many businesses are waiting to see what happens with the budget talks in Lansing and the negotiations between the UAW and Detroit's automakers before making any major decisions, said David Boyle, chief executive and president of National City's Michigan and northwest Ohio operations.

"There is a real wait-and-see mind-set in the business community," he added.

Unlike some economists, DeKaser isn't bracing for the national economy to take a nosedive because of the troubled housing market and tighter lending conditions.

He predicts that the nationwide drop in home sales will bottom out at year's end, and residential construction activity will take another six to nine months after that to stabilize.

"The good news is that the worst is behind us," he said.

DeKaser pointed out that housing accounts for only a fifth of a household's total net worth. He dismissed worries about a credit crunch, noting that the corporate debt markets are still working.

The housing downturn "will hurt consumers, but the overall drag on the consumer economy is likely to be relatively modest," he said.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Article in September 20, 2007

Bush Wants to Expand
Mortgage Disclosures

Prior Plan to Boost
Borrower Awareness
Of Costs Is Revived


By DEBORAH SOLOMON
September 20, 2007

As President Bush seeks ways to respond to the subprime-mortgage meltdown, his administration is readying a plan that would help borrowers better understand the costs and fees associated with buying a home. The twist: It proposed and shelved a similar plan three years ago.

In 2004, the administration backed down amid fierce opposition from the housing industry and members of Congress from both parties. After spending two years trying to "simplify, improve and lower costs associated with obtaining home mortgages," the Department of Housing and Urban Development tabled its proposed rule "due to the significant number of questions raised."

The renewed emphasis on loan disclosure is prompting some head shaking among consumer groups, who say at least some of the current problems could have been avoided if HUD had succeeded in overhauling the rules. While parts of its original proposal were heavily criticized, there has long been widespread agreement that the paperwork borrowers receive when they reach the settlement table is opaque and confusing.

"Home buyers, particularly among those taking out subprime loans, all too frequently find that when they show up at the settlement table...their loan terms are different from what they understood," said Allen Fishbein, Consumer Federation of America's director of housing and credit policy.

Now, the administration plans to revive the proposal as one way to prevent a recurrence of some of the problems roiling the housing sector. The White House says it will announce new rules this fall. Mr. Bush, in a radio address this month, said his administration "is working on new rules to help our consumers compare and shop for loans that meet their budgets and needs."

Those efforts, along with the administration's overall response -- which also includes helping distressed homeowners refinance through the Federal Housing Administration and private lenders -- are expected to be discussed at a House Financial Services hearing today where HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will testify.

HUD has long agreed the settlement process is confusing but has been stymied in its efforts to make changes that would affect a huge, powerful industry that has grown up around the current rules. After its original proposal in 2002, HUD was deluged with more than 40,000 letters. In February 2004, Sen. Wayne Allard (R., Colo.) told Mr. Jackson -- who was then the nominee to head HUD -- that he couldn't support his nomination because of the proposed changes.

One month later, Mr. Jackson pulled the rule, saying the agency would "re-examine" and repropose it. HUD held a series of roundtables in 2005, but the issue moved to the back burner, administration officials said.

Brian Montgomery, assistant secretary of HUD, said the agency knows borrowers need better information and is working to improve disclosure. "If we can help consumers understand the fine print, we can help prevent them from getting in over their heads in the first place," he said in a written statement.

The biggest change is expected to be to the Good Faith Estimate, a document given to borrowers that lists costs such as title insurance, appraisals and other fees. The administration wants a more explicit detailing of mortgage-broker fees and loan terms, such as whether the interest rate increases or is there is a prepayment penalty.

At the same time, HUD plans to drop one of the more controversial aspects of the original proposal: allowing banks to handle the settlement in a single package at a set price, according to a HUD document. HUD viewed the provision as a way to bring down costs, but it ran into stiff opposition from smaller businesses, such as title companies and appraisers, who feared they would be squeezed by big banks and forced out of business.

The housing industry is bracing for HUD's revised proposal -- in particular, mortgage brokers, who are barraged with criticism in the current housing crisis. Members of Congress, consumer groups and others have accused mortgage brokers of steering individuals, including those with good credit, into subprime loans with higher interest rates that benefited them financially.

Brokers often receive fees from the lender when the borrower agrees to pay a higher interest rate than he or she qualifies for. The higher the rate, the higher the fee for the broker, though some lenders cap the amount they will pay. HUD is expected to require more explicit disclosure of broker compensation so borrowers clearly understand the relationship between broker and lender.

President Bush singled out the industry in a speech last month, saying his administration "will soon issue regulations that require mortgage brokers to fully disclose their fees and closing costs."

Mark Savitt, president-elect of the National Association of Mortgage Brokers, said his industry already provides adequate compensation information. "I don't know of anybody else in our industry where you completely disclose every dime you make in a transaction, so I don't know what more we could disclose," he said.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Article in September 19, 2007 WSJ

What the Rate Cut Means to You
Fed's Half-Point Move Likely to
Trim Payments on Credit Cards,
Home-Equity Lines,but Offer
Scant Relief on Certain Mortgages


September 19, 2007 WSJ
By JANE J. KIM and RUTH SIMON

Consumers should soon start feeling the impact of yesterday's Fed rate cut in the form of lower borrowing costs and stingier savings rates. But the rate cut doesn't offer much help for the key problems bedeviling many mortgage borrowers.

The Federal Reserve said it lowered short-term interest rates by half a percentage point, to 4.75%, to combat the effects of a weaker housing market and tighter credit on the broader economy. The steep reduction in the Fed funds rate surprised many on Wall Street who expected a more modest rate cut. Stocks rose sharply after the Fed's announcement, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average gaining 335.97 points, or 2.5%, to 13739.39.

The rate cut should reduce payments on many home-equity lines of credit, credit cards and some car loans. Perversely, however, some economists say it could lead to higher rates on fixed-rate mortgages down the road if bond markets expect the Fed move will spur higher economic growth or inflation.

There also is likely to be little immediate relief for borrowers with certain types of adjustable-rate mortgages. That's because the rates on some of these loans are tied to the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, which recently jumped sharply above the Fed funds rate because of the continuing credit crunch in the markets. Libor, which has drifted downward recently, is an interest rate charged by banks for short-term loans to each other.

"If Libor doesn't come down, there is no relief" for many mortgage borrowers, says James Bianco, president of Bianco Research LLC, a market-research firm in Chicago.

Borrowers who should see immediate benefits from the Fed cut are those holding loans tied to U.S. banks' prime rate. Consumers can contact their lenders to inquire how their rates are calculated. Many banks cut their prime rates by half a percentage point after yesterday's Fed move.

Here is a look at what the Fed's action means for consumers:

• Homeowners. The rate cut is good news for borrowers with home-equity lines of credit, and savings could show up as soon as the next monthly statement. Borrowers looking for a new fixed-rate home-equity loan could also see lower rates. There are likely to be regional differences, with lenders most likely to cut rates on these loans in areas where the housing market is healthy and the local economy is robust, says Doug Duncan, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association. Before the Fed's latest move, rates on home-equity lines averaged 8.72%, while home-equity loans averaged 8.29%, according to HSH Associates.

But in a twist, the Fed cut could boost rates down the road for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. These rates are typically influenced by rates on 10-year Treasurys, which have moved lower recently in anticipation of a quarter-point cut in rates and because of a flight to quality in bond markets. But if markets expect a higher level of economic growth than previously anticipated, or a pickup in inflation, borrowers could see "some modest increase in fixed-rates going forward, though not necessarily immediately," Mr. Duncan says.

Recent news has been mixed for borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages. Borrowers with ARMs that are tied to Treasury averages have benefited from a recent decline in rates. For those who are facing their first rate reset on Oct. 1, "that reset will be less painful than it would have been had it taken place a couple months ago," says Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst with Bankrate.com.

But higher borrowing costs may still be in the offing for homeowners whose adjustables are tied to Libor. Libor is frequently used to set rates for subprime adjustables, loans made to borrowers with scuffed credit. As for non-subprime ARMs, roughly half of these originated in recent years are also tied to Libor, estimates Keith Gumbinger, a mortgage analyst with HSH Associates. Borrowers can determine which index their adjustable is tied to by checking their loan documents.

The rate cut isn't likely to do much for the biggest problem facing the mortgage market: a liquidity crunch that has made it tougher for many borrowers to get a loan. "People have been characterizing this as a bailout for housing, but I don't think that's accurate," says Mr. Duncan of the Mortgage Bankers Association. The rate cut is "much more about the broader economy," while the mortgage market's troubles are "all about credit and property values."

• Savers. Savers could soon see lower payouts on their savings accounts, certificates of deposit and money-market mutual funds. In fact, some banks have already started to reduce their rates or scale back their deals. Bank of America Corp., for instance, recently shortened the maturities on its promotional CDs paying 5% to four months from eight months.

Nevertheless, banks are going to be reluctant to cut rates before their competitors, in part because consumer deposits remain one of the cheapest sources of funds available for the banks, says Bankrate.com's Mr. McBride. In fact, average CD rates have barely budged in recent months with yields on five-, three- and one-year CDs currently at 4%, 3.77% and 3.76%. "That is very uncharacteristic," since CD yields normally move well in advance of a Fed action, he says. "Savers are getting a break."

Average yields on money-market mutual funds, which have been hovering at 5% for about a year, are likely to drop to about 4.5% in the next month, says Pete Crane of Crane Data LLC. But part of the fall in yields may be counteracted by some managers' moves to buy higher-yielding asset-backed commercial paper, he says. As a result, there may be a benefit to shopping around since money managers can differentiate their funds' performance by investing in the higher-yielding securities.

• Credit Cards. Many credit-card customers should soon see some relief. About 85% of all credit cards carry variable rates. But many holders of these cards will see a benefit only if their current rate exceeds any floors established by the issuers, typically around 14% to 15%, below which their rates can't fall. Today, most interest rates are in the 18%-to-19% range.

Since most issuers adjust their pricing on a monthly basis, about half of all variable-rate cards should see an adjustment in October, with the rest in November, says Robert McKinley, chief executive of CardWeb.com. "Consumers could find some money in their pockets in about a month." The half-percentage-point drop in rates should result in a savings of about $30 a month for the typical household, which carries a median credit-card debt of $7,000, he says.

• Auto Loans. A rate cut isn't likely to have a big impact on new-car loans in part because more than half of all auto loans are already offered at reduced rates due to heavy manufacturer incentives, says Art Spinella, president of CNW Marketing Research Inc. But the Fed's move could make it cheaper to get a used-car loan because many people turn to banks and credit unions to finance their purchase, he says.

Still, consumers could start seeing better financing deals if the Fed continues to cut rates. Auto-loan rates, generally tied to the movement in Treasurys, already had started to ease given the recent drop in Treasury yields. Average rates on five-year new-car loans are 7.72%, versus 7.81% on July 4, according to Bankrate.com.

• Student Loans. Students with private, variable-rate student loans pegged to the prime rate may see their rates adjust more quickly than borrowers with loans tied to Libor. (Loans pegged to Libor or the prime rate are split about equally.)

But that doesn't automatically mean that borrowers should switch to prime-based loans. Historically, loans pegged to Libor have tended to yield a slightly lower rate than loans tied to prime over the life of the loan, says Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Article in September 11, 2007 Detroit News

Home sales up, but lower than last year

Nathan Hurst / The Detroit News

More homes throughout Metro Detroit were sold in August than in July, but the slight end-of-summer uptick still left home sales lower than the same time last year, according to figures released Monday.

A total of 3,763 homes were sold in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb and Livingston counties in August, up 6.4 percent from the 3,538 in July, but off 3.4 percent from the 3,892 sold in August 2006. The numbers were released Monday by Realcomp, the Farmington Hills-based multiple listing service, and tracked sales of existing houses and condominiums in the four southeastern Michigan counties.

Except in Livingston County, homeowners who did sell their houses last month found the process taking more than 10 percent longer, Realcomp found.

Several factors continue to push home prices in the region down and leave properties languishing on the market for longer than in years past.

The Detroit area leads the nation's swelling roster of foreclosures, largely the result of a wave of reckless subprime home loans that's created a glut of homes on the market and prompted a steady slide in prices.

Conditions are even worse in Michigan, where job losses in the manufacturing sector give the state one of the nation's worst rates of unemployment.

In Wayne County, sales dropped to 1,660 last month from 1,700 in August 2006, a 2.35 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 108 days in August, an increase of 10.2 percent increase over last August, when the wait to sell averaged 98 days.

In Oakland County, sales dropped to 1,301 last month from 1,305 in August 2006, a 0.31 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 128 days in August, an increase of 11.3 percent compared with last August's 115 days.

In Macomb County, sales dropped to 609 last month from 682 in August 2006, a 10.7 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 106 days in August, an increase of 10.2 percent over last year, which posted an average of 97 days.

In Livingston County, sales dropped to 193 last month from 205 in August 2006, a 5.85 percent drop. The properties, however, sold more quickly, staying on the market an average of only 127 days this August, compared to 167 days in August 2006, a 23.95 percent improvement.

The price drop in Metro Detroit echoes trends reported late last month by the National Association of Realtors. The association reported a 0.2 percent drop in the national average sales price in July over the same month in 2006, and a 0.6 percent drop in the Midwest.

The drop in sales wasn't unexpected, according to Maureen Francis, a Realtor with SKBK Sotheby's International Realty in Birmingham. She added that the slower pace is hurting sellers more than buyers.

"There are bargains to be found," Francis said, "but the luxury, high-end market here is still thriving. For the average home buyer, the ball is in their court."

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Article in September 13, 2007 WSJ

Home-Loan Report Portends More Pain

By RICK BROOKS
September 13, 2007

An analysis of federal data on nearly 14 million U.S. home loans made last year portends more misery for subprime borrowers, lenders and investors, as existing loans are pressured by falling home prices and lenders put tougher underwriting standards in place.

The study by the Federal Reserve, based on data collected each year under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, found that the percentage of U.S. mortgages carrying high interest rates (generally, subprime loans) climbed to about 29% last year from 26% in 2005.

In the report, Fed researchers said the data affirmed that the rise or fall of home prices is the biggest factor in predicting mortgage-loan performance, as opposed to the creditworthiness of borrowers and other variables. The study also linked higher concentrations of high-rate loans to rising rates of serious delinquency, or mortgages with payments overdue by at least 90 days.

The study examined loans issued by 8,886 lenders nationwide, which generate an estimated 80% of U.S. home mortgages. The lenders are required to disclose dozens of pieces of information about each mortgage made or applied for, including pricing information for loans with interest rates exceeding certain thresholds. For first-lien loans, lenders must report which loans have interest rates at least three percentage points higher than Treasury securities of comparable maturity.

The 2006 increase in high-rate loans was fueled partly by the flattened yield curve, or gap between long-term and short-term interest rates, which causes the number of loans exceeding the reporting thresholds to rise even if lenders don't charge borrowers higher interest rates. Still, the data suggest frenzied competition for subprime loans, even as the housing market was weakening.

Market shares of the 10 largest high-rate lenders by volume declined to 35% from 59% in 2005, the Fed said. Banks and other depository institutions increased their penetration of the high-rate market, likely reflecting aggressive promotion of subprime loans to borrowers with blemished credit histories.

Dan Immergluck, an associate professor at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said the surge by traditional banks reinforces the need for regulators to intensify mortgage oversight as part of their supervision of the banking industry. "Half the market actually is the stuff the regulators could have had significant influence over, and maybe still can," he said.

The overall denial rate for home loans climbed to 29%, from 27% in 2005. The report didn't cite the likely reason for the increase, but it could reflect stricter underwriting by lenders as well as borrowers stretching for larger loans or sinking into financial trouble.

The percentage of first-lien purchase loans to investors or second-home buyers fell for the first time since 1996. Such loans are considered riskier than those to owner occupants. The decline was modest, possibly reflecting that widespread real-estate speculation continued well after the housing market slowed.

According to the study, African-American and Hispanic borrowers also remain much more likely than whites to pay high interest rates on mortgages. In 2006, about 54% of first-lien home-purchase loans to African-Americans exceeded the high-rate threshold, compared with 18% for non-Hispanic whites.

Lenders and bank regulators say the disparities largely reflect differences in income and credit histories, not race discrimination. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data don't include credit scores, so regulators use the information as a starting point in investigating possible discrimination.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Article in September 12, 2007 Detroit Free Press

Home sales up, but lower than last year

Nathan Hurst / The Detroit News

More homes throughout Metro Detroit were sold in August than in July, but the slight end-of-summer uptick still left home sales lower than the same time last year, according to figures released Monday.

A total of 3,763 homes were sold in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb and Livingston counties in August, up 6.4 percent from the 3,538 in July, but off 3.4 percent from the 3,892 sold in August 2006. The numbers were released Monday by Realcomp, the Farmington Hills-based multiple listing service, and tracked sales of existing houses and condominiums in the four southeastern Michigan counties.

Except in Livingston County, homeowners who did sell their houses last month found the process taking more than 10 percent longer, Realcomp found.

Several factors continue to push home prices in the region down and leave properties languishing on the market for longer than in years past.

The Detroit area leads the nation's swelling roster of foreclosures, largely the result of a wave of reckless subprime home loans that's created a glut of homes on the market and prompted a steady slide in prices.

Conditions are even worse in Michigan, where job losses in the manufacturing sector give the state one of the nation's worst rates of unemployment.

In Wayne County, sales dropped to 1,660 last month from 1,700 in August 2006, a 2.35 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 108 days in August, an increase of 10.2 percent increase over last August, when the wait to sell averaged 98 days.

In Oakland County, sales dropped to 1,301 last month from 1,305 in August 2006, a 0.31 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 128 days in August, an increase of 11.3 percent compared with last August's 115 days.

In Macomb County, sales dropped to 609 last month from 682 in August 2006, a 10.7 percent drop. Homes there stayed on the market for an average of 106 days in August, an increase of 10.2 percent over last year, which posted an average of 97 days.

In Livingston County, sales dropped to 193 last month from 205 in August 2006, a 5.85 percent drop. The properties, however, sold more quickly, staying on the market an average of only 127 days this August, compared to 167 days in August 2006, a 23.95 percent improvement.

The price drop in Metro Detroit echoes trends reported late last month by the National Association of Realtors. The association reported a 0.2 percent drop in the national average sales price in July over the same month in 2006, and a 0.6 percent drop in the Midwest.

The drop in sales wasn't unexpected, according to Maureen Francis, a Realtor with SKBK Sotheby's International Realty in Birmingham. She added that the slower pace is hurting sellers more than buyers.

"There are bargains to be found," Francis said, "but the luxury, high-end market here is still thriving. For the average home buyer, the ball is in their court."

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Article in September 6, 2007 WSJ

Conventional Mortgage
Has Lenders Competing

By JILIAN MINCER
September 6, 2007

While subprime and jumbo mortgage loans are drying up, there is plenty of cash flowing to borrowers with stellar credit who want conventional fixed-rate mortgages.

Banks and credit unions are battling for these customers with fee waivers, competitive interest rates and a willingness to negotiate on rates that have dropped in the past three months.

"I've talked to many banks who are anxious to lend," says James Chessen, chief economist for the American Bankers Association in Washington. "A good credit risk will always have access to funds at the best rates in the market."

This summer's subprime crisis has tightened lending standards, making it extremely difficult for borrowers with less than perfect credit to get a mortgage, especially if they are stretching to afford their first home.

Even consumers with solid credit scores and high incomes are now finding it more difficult and more expensive to find jumbo mortgage loans, which are loans of more than $417,000. A mortgage that large is often necessary on either coast because of high home costs.

But individuals with good credit and a down payment are in the driver's seat at a time when the average 30-year fixed rate mortgage on a loan of less than $417,000 was 6.5% yesterday, according to Bankrate.com's benchmark 30-year fixed rate. The bigger the down payment, the more the borrower's negotiating strength.

One reason for the current strong market for conventional, or "conforming," mortgages is that there is plenty of cash to lend because "investors are willing to invest in these sectors," says Joe Rogers, executive vice president at Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.

They know, he says, that borrowers need to meet standards set by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored housing finance agencies that purchase conventional mortgages and repackage them into mortgage bonds to sell to investors.

Bill Hampel, chief economist for the Credit Union National Association, says investors have lost confidence in the subprime loans available to borrowers with weaker credit because so many were issued with poor underwriting standards.

He says credit unions typically sell only 25% to 30% of their loans, and hold the rest. As a result, they are very concerned about ensuring that the borrower can repay the loan down the road. Despite distress elsewhere, first-mortgage delinquencies at credit unions are 0.33% and net charge-offs are 0.02%.

Lending institutions are fighting to win business from consumers with good credit, many of which may be hesitant to buy, refinance or move up in the current housing market.

"It's a very competitive marketplace," says Terry Francisco, a spokesman for Bank of America Corp. in Charlotte, N.C. "We watch our competition closely."

One of the reasons banks want to make conventional loans is that consumers often end up with several products from the lender, including savings accounts, credit cards and checking accounts.

"We find that someone who has a mortgage with us will have about five products in addition to the mortgage," says Mr. Francisco.

Bank of America and other lending institutions are trying to entice borrowers by offering special deals.

For example, Bank of America's "No Fee Mortgage Plus" saves consumers about $3,000 in closing costs, which the bank covers. The interest rate varies among states and customers.

The current demand for home buyers with good credit makes it even more important for potential borrowers to shop around for the best deals. Individuals should check with their local credit union and bank, especially if they have existing accounts with those institutions.

A person's credit score is based on a number of factors, including their payment history, utilization of available credit and mix of debt. The range is from 300 to 850. Anything over 720 is very good and more than 750 is excellent.

Lenders consider not only borrowers' credit score and down payment, but also their debt level when making an assessment. The general standard is a debt-to-income ratio of 28/36. That means a household's monthly mortgage payment shouldn't exceed 28% of its monthly pretax income. Total debt payments, including credit cards, student loans and car payments, shouldn't exceed 36% of the household's pretax income.

Victoria Maldonado has benefited from the current market. She and her fiancé had a good credit score and 20% down payment when they started shopping for a conventional mortgage.

They selected Bank of America because it paid their closing costs. Two weeks later, they closed on their Houston home.

"We had good credit, but what [the bank] offered was awesome," she says.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Article in September 4, 2007 WSJ

Why Congress Is Unlikely
To Act Soon on Foreclosures


ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 4, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Want government help to get out of a bad subprime mortgage? Don't look for Congress to come to your rescue anytime soon.

Lawmakers have lots of ideas and plans -- as well as hearings to share their concerns and assess blame -- but there is no consensus on how to stop the foreclosures. The only thing everyone has agreed on is that something must be done.

"We may have as many as one million to three million people who could lose their homes, not because they lost their jobs, not because the economy collapsed, but because they got bad deals on mortgages," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.

House and Senate lawmakers are working on different plans to help Americans out of the mortgage crisis, none of which seems ready for signing by President Bush. Sen. Dodd acknowledged as much last week as he urged the White House to take action, despite all the mortgage-related legislation his committee has planned for the fall.

"Those matters will take a little more time," Sen. Dodd said.

Financial markets in the U.S. and around the globe have been shaken by fears about spreading credit problems that started with home mortgages. It began with rising defaults in subprime mortgages -- home loans made to people with weak credit histories. The delinquencies have jolted global credit markets because big hedge funds and other investors poured lots of money into risky subprime mortgages because of their higher returns and now face the prospect that they won't be repaid.

The House and Senate are working on different tracks but the plan furthest down the road is in the Senate, where senators will vote in September on the Transportation-Housing and Urban Development departments spending bill. Inside that bill is $100 million earmarked for nonprofit housing groups to help homeowners in refinancing.

"First and foremost, we need people on the ground to help innocent mortgagors, innocent homeowners refinance when they're on the edge of foreclosure and yet they have the wherewithal for refinancing," said Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.), who sits on the Senate Banking Committee.